AI Skill Report Card

Designing Purposeful Motion

A-83·Feb 25, 2026·Source: Web
YAML
--- name: designing-purposeful-motion description: Designs functional web animations using the MOTION framework with UX-first approach. Use when adding animation to interfaces, improving user experience through motion, or validating animation purposes. ---

Purposeful Motion Design

15 / 15

Before any animation work:

UX Function Check:
1. What user need does this animation serve?
2. Does it guide attention, provide feedback, or show relationships?
3. Can the interface work without it?

If you can't answer #1 clearly, don't animate.
Recommendation
Add a concrete accessibility testing checklist in the workflow section
14 / 15

Progress:

  • Define animation's UX function (feedback, guidance, hierarchy, continuity)
  • Choose appropriate duration (100ms micro, 200-300ms transitions, 500ms+ pages)
  • Select easing curve (ease-out entrances, ease-in exits, ease-in-out bidirectional)
  • Implement with fallbacks (prefers-reduced-motion)
  • Test on actual devices and connections
  • Validate against function - does it achieve the UX goal?
Recommendation
Include one example showing a bad animation with explanation of why it fails the UX function test
18 / 20

Example 1: Button Feedback Input: "I want the button to feel responsive" UX Function: Provide immediate tactile feedback Output:

CSS
.button { transform: scale(1); transition: transform 100ms ease-out; } .button:active { transform: scale(0.98); }

Example 2: Page Transition Input: "Smooth page changes" UX Function: Maintain spatial continuity between views Output:

CSS
.page-transition { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(20px); transition: opacity 500ms ease-out, transform 500ms ease-out; } .page-transition.visible { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }

Example 3: Scroll Reveal Input: "Animate content as user scrolls" UX Function: Progressive disclosure to reduce cognitive load Output:

CSS
.reveal { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(40px); transition: opacity 300ms ease-out 0.1s, transform 300ms ease-out 0.1s; } .reveal.in-view { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }
Recommendation
Compress the duration guidelines and easing strategy sections - they're slightly verbose for Claude's knowledge level
  • 100ms: Micro-feedback (hovers, button presses, toggles)
  • 200-300ms: Element transitions (dropdowns, modals, state changes)
  • 500ms+: Page-level changes (route transitions, major layout shifts)
  • 1000ms+: Loading states, complex sequences
  • ease-out (0.25, 0.46, 0.45, 0.94): Entrances, reveals, expansions
  • ease-in (0.55, 0.055, 0.675, 0.19): Exits, dismissals, contractions
  • ease-in-out (0.645, 0.045, 0.355, 1): Bidirectional, position changes
  • Custom cubic-bezier: For brand-specific character

Layer multiple properties with staggered timing:

CSS
.card { transform: translateY(0); box-shadow: 0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); transition: transform 200ms ease-out, box-shadow 250ms ease-out 50ms; } .card:hover { transform: translateY(-4px); box-shadow: 0 8px 24px rgba(0,0,0,0.15); }

Show progress and maintain engagement:

CSS
.skeleton { background: linear-gradient(90deg, #f0f0f0 25%, #e0e0e0 50%, #f0f0f0 75%); background-size: 200% 100%; animation: loading 1.5s infinite; } @keyframes loading { 0% { background-position: 200% 0; } 100% { background-position: -200% 0; } }
  • Always include prefers-reduced-motion: reduce fallbacks
  • Test on 60fps and 120fps displays
  • Use transform and opacity for performance
  • Stagger multiple element animations by 50-100ms
  • Provide immediate feedback (<100ms) for user inputs
  • Match animation personality to brand character
  • Decorative motion: "It looks cool" isn't a UX function
  • Duration mismatch: 500ms micro-interactions feel sluggish
  • Easing confusion: Using ease-in for entrances feels unnatural
  • Missing fallbacks: Breaking experience for motion-sensitive users
  • Performance ignorance: Animating width/height instead of transform
  • Overuse: Every element doesn't need animation
0
Grade A-AI Skill Framework
Scorecard
Criteria Breakdown
Quick Start
15/15
Workflow
14/15
Examples
18/20
Completeness
18/20
Format
15/15
Conciseness
13/15