An AI skill is a structured system prompt or set of custom instructions that gives AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini specialized capabilities. It includes a clear role definition, specific knowledge areas, step-by-step processes, and quality criteria that help AI perform specific professional tasks.

How does Skill This work?

Simply describe your professional expertise in plain text. Our free AI skill generator analyzes your input and transforms it into a structured system prompt. The skill is then graded on clarity, specificity, and usefulness. You can share your skill via a unique URL or copy it to use as custom instructions with any AI assistant like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

Is Skill This free to use?

Yes, Skill This is completely free. No account or payment is required. You can create unlimited skills and share them with anyone.

How is my skill graded?

Skills are graded on a scale from A+ to F (0-100 points). The grade reflects how clear, specific, and actionable your skill is. Higher grades indicate skills that AI assistants can use more effectively.

How do I use my skill with an AI assistant?

Copy your generated skill and paste it into the system prompt or custom instructions of any AI assistant. For ChatGPT, use Personalization > Custom Instructions. For Claude, add it to a Project's instructions. For Cursor or other IDEs, save it as a .cursorrules or CLAUDE.md file. The AI will then adopt that skill and perform tasks according to your expertise.

AI Skill Report Card

Curating Frontend Inspiration

B+78·Aug 26, 2026·Source: Web

Quick Start13 / 15

Before writing any frontend code, spend 10 minutes browsing curated references to establish a visual direction. Pick one primary component library, one animation library, and 1-2 inspiration sources — don't mix five different design languages into one project.

Design direction checklist:
1. Component base: kokonutui.com OR magicui.design OR reactbits.dev
2. Animation layer: motion.dev (UI micro-interactions) or animejs.com (creative/complex) or threejs.org (3D/WebGL)
3. Layout/interaction inspiration: collectui.com (search specific patterns like "onboarding", "empty state")
4. Dashboard reference: bklit.com (if building admin/analytics UI)
5. Open-source code reference: kage, towers, sketchbook (Meng To's projects) for design-engineering craft

Recommendation▾

Add a concrete before/after code snippet or visual example (e.g., generic pricing grid vs. improved one) to ground abstract advice in tangible output

Workflow13 / 15

Progress:

Step 1: Define the product's visual personality (minimal/technical, playful/bold, editorial/content-heavy)
Step 2: Pick ONE component library as the base system
Step 3: Pick ONE animation library matched to complexity needs
Step 4: Search CollectUI for the 2-3 specific UI patterns needed (nav, forms, cards, empty states)
Step 5: Study one reference site end-to-end (not just screenshots) — inspect spacing, timing, transitions
Step 6: Build a small interactive prototype of the signature interaction before building the full page
Step 7: Review against "Common Pitfalls" before shipping

Choosing a component library

kokonutui.com — modern, animated, opinionated components. Good default for SaaS/product sites.
magicui.design — marketing-site focused (hero sections, bento grids, text effects). Good for landing pages.
reactbits.dev — granular, copy-paste React primitives with built-in animation. Good when you need one specific effect, not a whole system.

Choosing an animation approach

motion.dev (formerly Framer Motion) — default choice for React UI: page transitions, hover states, layout animations. Use motion.dev/ai-kit if generating animation code via AI to keep output idiomatic.
animejs.com — framework-agnostic, best for complex timeline-based sequences (SVG morphing, staggered choreography) outside typical component states.
threejs.org — only when the design genuinely needs 3D/WebGL (particle fields, 3D product viewers). Don't reach for this by default — it's the most expensive in dev time and performance cost.

Dashboard-specific work

Reference bklit.com for data-dense layouts: chart placement, sidebar density, metric card hierarchy, dark-mode contrast handling. It ships components — inspect its DOM/CSS rather than only screenshotting.

Studying open-source references (Kage, Towers, Sketchbook)

These are Meng To's projects (Design+Code) — study them for engineering-level design craft:

Consistent spacing scale and type system across every screen
Restrained animation (used for feedback, not decoration)
Component composition patterns (how small primitives combine into full screens)

Clone and read the source, don't just view the live demo.

Recommendation▾

Include fallback guidance for when referenced sites/tools become unavailable or outdated, since the skill heavily depends on external URLs

Examples16 / 20

Example 1: Input: "Build a landing page for a dev tool startup" Output: Base components from magicui.design (hero, bento grid, marquee logos) + motion.dev for scroll-triggered fade/slide-ins + one CollectUI search for "pricing table" patterns to avoid a generic 3-column pricing grid. No Three.js — a dev tool audience values fast load over 3D flourish.

Example 2: Input: "Build an analytics dashboard for a B2B app" Output: Study bklit.com's component structure for sidebar nav + metric cards + chart containers. Use kokonutui.com for the data-table and dropdown components. Motion.dev only for number count-up and tab-switch transitions — nothing decorative given the data-dense context.

Example 3: Input: "Add a distinctive hero interaction to make the site memorable" Output: Prototype the interaction in isolation first using anime.js (if timeline-based, e.g., staggered SVG line draw) or reactbits.dev (if it's a self-contained effect like a text scramble). Only integrate into the full page once the interaction feels right at 60fps.

Recommendation▾

Add an edge case for constrained scenarios (no budget for premium libraries, accessibility requirements conflicting with animation-heavy choices)

Best Practices

Pick one system, commit to it. Mixing component libraries creates visual inconsistency (different border-radius scales, shadow styles, spacing units) — a top signal of "AI slop."
Motion should communicate state, not decorate. Every animation should answer "what changed?" (loading, success, focus, navigation) — not just "make it feel alive."
Match animation cost to actual need. Three.js/WebGL only when 3D is core to the product story; otherwise it's wasted performance budget.
Study real sites' code/DOM, not just screenshots — spacing rhythm and timing curves are invisible in static images but are what separates polished work from generic templates.
Establish a spacing/type scale before touching components — inconsistent scale is the fastest way to make a component-library site look assembled rather than designed.

Common Pitfalls

Combining components from 3+ different libraries with mismatched border-radius, shadows, and font stacks.
Adding animation to everything (every card hovers, every icon spins) — this reads as generic/AI-generated rather than intentional.
Reaching for Three.js/WebGL as a default "make it look cool" move instead of a deliberate choice tied to content.
Copying a hero section pixel-for-pixel from inspiration without adapting it to the actual content and brand — recognizable "magicui hero #3" syndrome.
Skipping the prototype step and building signature interactions directly inside the full layout, making iteration slow and expensive.