AI Skill Report Card

Validating UX Decisions

B+78·Feb 25, 2026·Source: Web
YAML
--- name: validating-ux-decisions description: Validates UX design decisions using lightweight research methods. Use when you need to test usability, landing page clarity, navigation structure, or prioritize design changes without dedicated UX research resources. ---

UX Validation for Brand Designers

15 / 15

5-Minute Landing Page Test:

  1. Show page for 5 seconds
  2. Hide page, ask: "What is this company/product? What can you do here? What would you click first?"
  3. Show again, ask them to complete primary action
  4. Note confusion points and time to completion
Recommendation
Add more concrete input/output examples - only 2 examples provided and they lack detail on actual findings/changes made
13 / 15

Research Planning Checklist

Progress:

  • Define key question (usability issue, clarity, findability, conversion)
  • Choose method based on question type
  • Recruit 5-8 participants (internal team + 3-5 external)
  • Prepare scripts/materials
  • Test with 1 person first
  • Document findings in simple template
  • Present 3 key insights + recommended changes
Recommendation
Reduce length by consolidating similar sections - heuristic evaluation checklist could be shortened to key principles

Script Template:

"I'm testing the website, not you. Think aloud as you try to [specific task].
If you get stuck, that helps us improve it."

Tasks (pick 2-3):
- Find pricing for [specific service]
- Contact sales about [scenario]
- Download [specific resource]
- Sign up for trial/demo

Observer notes: Where do they pause? What do they expect vs find?

Logistics:

  • Coffee shops, coworking spaces, industry events
  • 10-15 minutes per person
  • Offer $10-20 gift card or coffee
  • Use phone screen recording (ask permission)

What to Test:

  • Value proposition clarity
  • Primary action visibility
  • Trust indicators effectiveness
  • Visual hierarchy

Questions to Ask:

  1. What is this company/product?
  2. Who is it for?
  3. What would you click first?
  4. What's the main benefit?

Red Flags:

  • Hesitation before answering
  • Generic/vague responses
  • Focus on wrong elements

Setup:

  • List all main pages/sections on cards
  • Ask users to group related items
  • Have them name each group
  • Test with 8-12 people

Digital Tools:

  • OptimalSort (free tier)
  • Miro/Figma boards
  • Physical index cards

Analysis:

  • Look for items consistently grouped together
  • Note what people name categories
  • Items placed in multiple groups need clearer labeling

Nielsen's 10 Principles Checklist:

Visibility of System Status:

  • Loading states shown
  • Current page highlighted in nav
  • Form validation immediate

Match Real World:

  • Icons universally understood
  • Language matches user terms
  • Logical flow matches mental model

User Control:

  • Undo/cancel options
  • Clear exit paths
  • User can control pace

Consistency:

  • Same actions work same way
  • Visual patterns consistent
  • Language consistent

Error Prevention:

  • Constraints prevent bad input
  • Confirmation for destructive actions
  • Smart defaults provided

Recognition > Recall:

  • Options visible vs memorized
  • Instructions accessible when needed
  • Progress indicators clear

Efficiency:

  • Shortcuts for power users
  • Bulk actions available
  • Minimal steps to complete tasks

Aesthetic Design:

  • No irrelevant information
  • Clear visual hierarchy
  • White space used well

Error Recovery:

  • Plain language error messages
  • Constructive solutions offered
  • Easy to recover

Help Documentation:

  • Searchable help
  • Task-focused
  • Concise steps

Severity Scale: 0=No problem, 1=Cosmetic, 2=Minor, 3=Major, 4=Catastrophic

Key Metrics to Track:

Bounce Rate Issues:

  • 70% = unclear value prop or wrong traffic

  • Compare top entry pages
  • Check mobile vs desktop

Conversion Funnels:

  • Biggest drop-off points = redesign priority
  • Forms with <50% completion = too complex
  • CTAs with <2% click rate = positioning/copy issue

Hotjar Heatmaps:

  • Clicks on non-clickable elements = missed expectations
  • Scroll depth <50% = content too long/boring
  • Rage clicks = usability problem

User Session Recordings:

  • Watch 10 sessions weekly
  • Note: confusion points, unexpected behavior, task failures
  • Look for patterns across sessions

Prioritization Framework: High Impact + Low Effort = Do First

  • Traffic volume × conversion impact × implementation ease
  • Focus on pages with >1000 monthly visitors first
10 / 20

Example 1: Landing Page Test Input: SaaS pricing page with 15% conversion Process: 5-second test + task completion Output: "Users confused about which plan includes API access. Move feature comparison above fold." Result: 23% conversion after changes

Example 2: Navigation Card Sort Input: 12 main website sections Process: 10 users group and label categories Output: 80% grouped "Case Studies" with "Portfolio", suggesting rename to "Our Work"

Recommendation
Include specific templates or frameworks rather than just mentioning them - provide actual email scripts, report templates, or scoring sheets
  • Test early and often - Validate before visual design
  • Start with highest-traffic pages - Biggest impact potential
  • Mix internal and external participants - Insider knowledge blinds you
  • Document everything - Use templates for consistency
  • Test competitors too - Understand user expectations
  • Focus on task completion - Not opinions about design
  • Over-recruiting - 5 users find 85% of usability issues
  • Leading questions - "Is this clear?" vs "What is this?"
  • Testing prototypes only - Real content reveals different issues
  • Ignoring mobile behavior - 60%+ traffic is mobile
  • Analysis paralysis - Ship improvements, measure, iterate
  • Fixing symptoms not causes - Button color won't fix unclear messaging

Quick Validation Cycle: Test → Analyze → Fix → Measure → Repeat every 2-4 weeks.

0
Grade B+AI Skill Framework
Scorecard
Criteria Breakdown
Quick Start
15/15
Workflow
13/15
Examples
10/20
Completeness
13/20
Format
15/15
Conciseness
12/15