AI Skill Report Card

Creating Healthcare AI POC Proposals

A-86·Sep 10, 2026·Source: Web
Markdown
--- name: creating-healthcare-ai-poc-proposals description: Creates structured AI proof-of-concept (POC) proposals for healthcare imaging companies deploying models on edge and cloud (e.g., DICOM-based platforms like Trice Imaging). Use when drafting a technical proposal for an AI feature (real-time reading, worklist prioritization, automated QA, retention features) that needs problem framing, workflow, architecture diagrams, tech stack, dependencies, and effort estimation in man-months. --- # Creating Healthcare AI POC Proposals
14 / 15

A POC proposal is a single markdown/slide doc following this skeleton:

# POC Title
Recommendation
Fix the truncated Example 2 output which cuts off mid-sentence ('writes priority score to worklist D')

Fill each section using the templates below. Always tie the POC back to a clinical/business KPI (radiologist read time, TAT, retention, revenue).
15 / 15

Progress:

  • Step 1: Identify POC category and target user (radiologist, tech, PACS admin)
  • Step 2: Write problem statement with quantifiable pain point
  • Step 3: Draft end-to-end workflow (input → AI processing → output → user action)
  • Step 4: Design architecture diagram (edge inference vs cloud inference split)
  • Step 5: Specify tech stack per layer (DICOM handling, AI serving, frontend viewer, infra)
  • Step 6: List dependencies (datasets, DICOM conformance, hardware, third-party APIs)
  • Step 7: Break effort into phases with man-month estimates
  • Step 8: Define success metrics and demo scope (what "done" looks like for POC, not production)

Step 1: Identify POC Category

Map the request to one of the four archetypes (or a hybrid):

ArchetypeCore AI TaskPrimary UserEdge vs Cloud
Real-Time Interactive ReadingSegmentation/contour/abnormality detection on live DICOM streamRadiologistEdge inference for latency, cloud for heavy models
Worklist PrioritizationTriage classification (critical/urgent/routine)Radiologist, PACS adminCloud batch scoring on ingest
Automated Study QAProtocol/positioning/artifact detectionTech, QA leadEdge at modality/gateway
Retention FeatureLongitudinal analytics, auto-reporting, smart hanging protocolsReferring physician, patient portalCloud, low latency tolerance

Step 2: Problem Statement Template

Today, [user role] must [manual task] which takes [time/cost].
This causes [downstream impact: delayed diagnosis, missed critical findings,
radiologist burnout, revenue leakage].
[Company]'s platform already handles [existing capability, e.g., DICOM routing,
teleradiology streaming] but lacks [AI capability gap].

Step 3: Workflow Template

Describe as a numbered pipeline, always including trigger, processing, and human-in-the-loop step:

1. DICOM study received at [edge gateway / cloud ingest]
2. Pre-processing: de-identification, modality/series filtering
3. AI inference: [model type] runs on [edge/cloud]
4. Output generated: [mask/contour/score/label] overlaid or attached as DICOM-SR/SEG
5. Result surfaced in [viewer/worklist] with confidence score
6. Radiologist reviews, accepts/overrides → feedback loop stored for retraining

Step 4: Architecture Diagram

Use a layered diagram (describe in text/mermaid, since this is a proposal doc):

MERMAID
flowchart LR A[Modality / Scanner] --> B[Edge Gateway - DICOM Receiver] B --> C{Inference Location} C -->|Low latency, PHI-sensitive| D[Edge AI Inference Container] C -->|Heavy compute, batch| E[Cloud AI Inference Service] D --> F[Web DICOM Viewer] E --> F F --> G[Radiologist Workstation / Browser] D --> H[Cloud Sync - Anonymized Metadata + Model Feedback] E --> H H --> I[Model Retraining Pipeline]

Always show: acquisition → edge → cloud boundary → viewer → feedback loop. Mark PHI boundary explicitly.

Step 5: Tech Stack Template

Organize by layer, give a recommended default plus alternative:

LayerRecommendedAlternative
DICOM handlingOrthanc / dcm4chepynetdicom
Edge inference runtimeONNX Runtime / TensorRT on NVIDIA Jetson or industrial PCOpenVINO (CPU-only edge)
Cloud inferenceNVIDIA Triton on GPU (AWS/GCP/Azure)SageMaker/Vertex managed endpoints
AI model frameworkPyTorch (training), ONNX (export)MONAI (medical imaging specific)
Web viewerCornerstone.js / OHIF Viewerdcm.js custom viewer
Backend/APIFastAPI / Node.jsDjango REST
StorageS3-compatible object store + PACSCloud-native DICOM store (Google Healthcare API)
Infra/orchestrationDocker + Kubernetes (k3s at edge)Docker Compose for small POC
Auth/complianceOAuth2 + HIPAA-compliant audit logging

Step 6: Dependencies & Risks

Always cover these categories:

  • Data: annotated dataset availability, IRB/data-use agreements, class imbalance for rare abnormalities
  • Compliance: HIPAA/GDPR, de-identification pipeline, on-prem PHI restrictions for edge
  • Hardware: GPU availability at edge sites, network bandwidth for cloud fallback
  • Integration: existing PACS/RIS compatibility, DICOM conformance statement access
  • Model: FDA/regulatory pathway if moving beyond POC (mention as future risk, not POC scope)

Step 7: Effort Breakdown Template (Man-Months)

Break into 4 phases; scale numbers to POC size (typically 2–4 months total, 1–3 engineers):

PhaseTasksEffort (MM)
Data & SetupData collection/annotation, DICOM pipeline setup, dev environment0.5–1.0
Model DevelopmentTrain/fine-tune segmentation or classification model, export to ONNX1.0–1.5
IntegrationEdge/cloud inference deployment, viewer integration, overlay rendering1.0–1.5
Validation & DemoClinical validation with sample studies, performance benchmarking, demo prep0.5–1.0
Total3.0–5.0 MM

Always state team composition: e.g., "1 ML engineer, 1 full-stack/DICOM engineer, 0.5 clinical SME."

Step 8: Success Metrics

Give 3-5 measurable, POC-appropriate metrics (not production SLAs):

  • Model accuracy/Dice score on held-out test set (e.g., Dice ≥ 0.85 for segmentation)
  • Inference latency at edge (e.g., < 2s per series)
  • Radiologist review time reduction (qualitative in POC, quantify in pilot)
  • Successful DICOM round-trip with SEG/SR object generation
Recommendation
Add a brief 'common pitfalls' section (e.g., underestimating regulatory scope creep, overcommitting to production SLAs in POC)
18 / 20

Example 1: DICOM Real-Time Web Viewer + Abnormality Detection (given example)

Input: "AI POC for real-time web viewer with segmentation mask/contour for abnormality detection, edge + cloud deployment."

Output:

# POC 1: Real-Time Interactive Reading with AI-Assisted Abnormality Detection
Recommendation
Consider adding a third contrasting example showing a 'bad' proposal (e.g., missing PHI boundary or vague success metrics) to reinforce quality bar

Radiologists reviewing studies via Trice's live teleconsultation viewer must manually scan every series for abnormalities, adding 3-5 minutes per study and increasing risk of missed findings during high-volume on-call shifts. There is no AI-assisted overlay available during real-time collaborative review.

15 / 15
  1. Study streamed to web viewer during live consult session
  2. Edge gateway runs lightweight segmentation model (e.g., nnU-Net exported to ONNX) on incoming series in near real-time
  3. Contour/mask overlay generated and rendered as DICOM-SEG object
  4. Overlay streamed to viewer alongside live image, with confidence score badge
  5. Radiologist toggles AI overlay on/off during consult, can annotate agreement/disagreement
  6. Session feedback logged to cloud for model improvement

[Edge: Jetson/industrial PC at imaging site runs ONNX Runtime inference container] [Cloud: model registry, feedback aggregation, retraining pipeline on AWS/GCP] [Viewer: OHIF-based web viewer with custom overlay rendering layer] (See mermaid diagram in Step 4 template)

  • DICOM: Orthanc for routing, dcm4che for validation
  • Edge inference: ONNX Runtime + TensorRT on NVIDIA Jetson AGX
  • Model: MONAI-based segmentation (nnU-Net architecture)
  • Viewer: OHIF Viewer + Cornerstone.js custom overlay renderer
  • Cloud: AWS S3 + SageMaker for retraining, Triton for cloud fallback inference
  • Annotated dataset for target abnormality (min. 200-500 labeled studies)
  • Edge hardware provisioning at pilot sites
  • Real-time streaming protocol compatibility (WebRTC/DICOMweb) with existing Trice viewer
PhaseEffort (MM)
Data & Setup1.0
Model Development1.5
Edge/Cloud Integration1.5
Validation & Demo1.0
Total5.0
Team: 1 ML engineer, 1 DICOM/full-stack engineer, 0.5 radiologist SME
  • Dice score ≥ 0.85 on test set
  • Edge inference latency < 2s per series
  • Overlay renders correctly in live viewer session with < 500ms added lag

**Example 2: Worklist Prioritization POC (brief)**

Input: "Draft a POC for AI-based worklist prioritization."

Output:

POC 2: AI-Based Worklist Prioritization

Studies are read in arrival order regardless of clinical urgency, delaying diagnosis of critical findings (e.g., ICH, PE) by up to several hours in high-volume queues.

15 / 15
  1. Study lands in cloud ingest queue
  2. Triage classification model scores study (critical/urgent/routine) within seconds of upload
  3. Worklist re-ranks studies by urgency score
  4. Radiologist sees flagged critical studies at top with reason tag
  5. Ground truth (final report) fed back to retrain triage model monthly

Cloud-only inference (no real-time edge constraint) — batch scoring service triggered on DICOM ingest webhook, writes priority score to worklist D

0
Grade A-AI Skill Framework
Scorecard
Criteria Breakdown
Quick Start
14/15
Workflow
15/15
Examples
18/20
Completeness
18/20
Format
14/15
Conciseness
13/15