AI Skill Report Card

Designing Core Four Landing Pages

A-83·Oct 28, 2026·Source: Extension-page
13 / 15

For any B2B product/campaign, build these four page types as a connected system, not isolated pages:

  1. Overview/Product Page — top-of-funnel, explains what the product is and why it matters
  2. Comparison Page — mid-funnel, positions against named competitors/alternatives
  3. Social Proof Page — trust-building, leads with customer results and testimonials
  4. Demo Page — bottom-of-funnel, single CTA to book/watch a demo

Route traffic to the page matching visitor intent (cold ad traffic → Overview; competitor-aware traffic → Comparison; retargeting → Social Proof; high-intent/sales-assisted → Demo).

Recommendation▾
Add more examples (currently only 2) to cover Social Proof and Demo page scenarios concretely, plus a 'bad output' example for contrast
14 / 15

Progress:

  • Step 1: Define the campaign goal and traffic source for each page
  • Step 2: Draft the Overview/Product page skeleton
  • Step 3: Draft the Comparison page skeleton
  • Step 4: Draft the Social Proof page skeleton
  • Step 5: Draft the Demo page skeleton
  • Step 6: Cross-link pages logically (nav, CTAs, exit paths)
  • Step 7: Apply elevation techniques (motion, real content, proof)
  • Step 8: Review against checklist before shipping

Step 1: Define intent mapping

Before touching layout, write down: who lands here, what they already believe, what objection this page must kill. Each of the four pages solves a different objection — don't blend them.

Step 2: Overview/Product Page

Structure:

  • Hero: outcome-driven headline (not feature-driven), subhead clarifying who it's for
  • Problem/agitation section
  • Product walkthrough (screenshots, short feature blocks — 3 to 5 max)
  • Primary CTA repeated at natural scroll-stops (hero, mid, end)
  • Light social proof (logos, 1 quote) — full proof lives on the Social Proof page

Step 3: Comparison Page

Structure:

  • Headline naming the comparison directly ("X vs Y")
  • Comparison table: lead with 3-5 dimensions where you clearly win
  • Avoid strawmanning — concede categories where competitor is reasonably strong, it builds credibility
  • "Why teams switch" section with a migration-focused testimonial
  • CTA: "Switch to [Product]" or "See it in action" — not a generic "Get Started"

Step 4: Social Proof Page

Structure:

  • Lead with a results-first stat or headline ("How [Company] achieved X")
  • Mix formats: written quotes, case study cards, video testimonials, logo wall
  • Segment proof by use case or industry if audience is varied
  • CTA should feel like an invitation to join a peer group, not a sales pitch

Step 5: Demo Page

Structure:

  • Minimal page — one job only: get the form filled or demo booked
  • Strip nav/footer distractions if possible
  • Short, specific headline on what happens after signup ("See [Product] in a live 20-min walkthrough")
  • Form above the fold, short field count
  • Trust signal right next to the form (single testimonial or logo strip), not the whole case study

Step 6: Cross-linking

  • Overview page links out to Comparison (for skeptics) and Social Proof (for researchers)
  • Comparison and Social Proof pages both funnel to Demo
  • Demo page has no exits except the form

Step 7: Elevate

Apply "more ways to elevate" principles:

  • Replace stock imagery with real product screenshots/UI
  • Add subtle scroll-triggered motion to reinforce key proof points (not decorative)
  • Make headlines specific (numbers, named outcomes) over generic claims
Recommendation▾
Include a copy/wireframe template snippet (e.g., actual headline formulas or a sample comparison table) rather than only structural descriptions
14 / 20

Example 1: Input: B2B project management tool, cold paid traffic campaign Output: Overview page with hero "Ship projects 30% faster without the status-meeting overhead," 4 feature blocks (timeline view, async updates, client portal, integrations), logo wall below hero, single CTA "Start Free Trial" repeated 3x.

Example 2: Input: Competitor-aware audience currently using Asana Output: Comparison page headlined "[Product] vs Asana: Built for teams who outgrew task lists," table comparing automation depth, client-facing views, and pricing transparency (conceding Asana wins on raw integrations count), ending with a migration testimonial and "See the switch in 15 minutes" CTA to Demo page.

Recommendation▾
Show a concrete before/after of a weak vs. strong headline to make the specificity principle more actionable
  • One page = one job. Resist cramming comparison content into the overview page.
  • Use real customer language in headlines and section titles, pulled from reviews/calls — not invented marketing copy.
  • Keep the Demo page CTA-singular: no secondary links, no nav escape hatches.
  • Reuse testimonials strategically — same quote can appear abbreviated on Overview and in full on Social Proof.
  • Test headline specificity: a number or named outcome almost always outperforms an abstract claim.
  • Don't put a comparison table on the Overview page — it introduces doubt before value is established.
  • Don't overload the Demo page with full case studies — it kills completion rate.
  • Don't treat all four pages as variations of the same template with swapped headlines — each needs distinct structure matched to visitor intent.
  • Don't strawman competitors on the Comparison page — overselling your advantage reads as dishonest and erodes trust.
  • Don't skip the cross-linking step — pages built in isolation leave visitors stranded with no next step.
0
Grade A-AI Skill Framework
Scorecard
Criteria Breakdown
Quick Start
13/15
Workflow
14/15
Examples
14/20
Completeness
16/20
Format
14/15
Conciseness
13/15