AI Skill Report Card

Engineering Photography Prompts

A-85·Aug 26, 2026·Source: Extension-selection

Engineering Photography Prompts

Translates visual concepts into precise, layered prompt language using real photography terminology to produce predictable, professional-quality AI-generated images.

14 / 15

Structure every prompt in this order: Subject → Environment → Lighting → Camera/Technical → Style/Post-processing

Portrait of a woman in her 30s, freckled skin, wind-swept auburn hair,
wearing an oversized cream wool sweater, contemplative expression,
standing by a rain-streaked window | soft overcast window light from
camera left, low contrast, gentle shadow falloff | shot on 85mm lens
at f/1.8, eye level, shallow depth of field with soft bokeh | muted
color palette, filmic grain, inspired by Peter Lindbergh, editorial
black-and-white photography aesthetic

Never write vague descriptors ("nice lighting," "blurry background"). Always write technical equivalents ("soft window light, low contrast," "shallow depth of field at f/1.8, creamy bokeh").

Recommendation
Add an example showing a 'bad' vague prompt vs corrected version to make good/bad contrast explicit
14 / 15

Progress:

  • Step 1: Intake — identify subject, use case, target platform, and any style references
  • Step 2: Analyze references — extract lighting direction, color palette, composition, photographer influences
  • Step 3: Construct — build the five-layer prompt (subject, environment, lighting, technical, style)
  • Step 4: Optimize — add platform-specific syntax, negative prompts, remove ambiguity
  • Step 5: Iterate — refine based on output, document what worked

Layer Details

  1. Subject: who/what, specific attributes, pose, expression, materials/textures, scale
  2. Environment: location type, background treatment (sharp/blurred/minimal), atmosphere, time of day
  3. Lighting: source (natural/artificial), direction (front/side/back/Rembrandt/butterfly/split), quality (hard/soft/diffused), color temperature
  4. Technical/Camera: perspective (eye-level/low/high/bird's eye), focal length effect (wide/telephoto/standard), depth of field, exposure style (high key/low key/silhouette)
  5. Style: genre (portrait/fashion/product/editorial), era, post-processing (film emulation, color grade, grain), photographer reference

Platform Syntax Cheatsheet

  • Midjourney: append --ar 4:5 --v 6 --style raw; use :: multi-prompt weighting for emphasis
  • DALL-E: pure natural language, no parameter flags; describe style mixing in prose
  • Stable Diffusion: use (term:1.3) weighting syntax; separate negative prompt field
  • Flux: favor long, detailed, photorealistic natural-language paragraphs over keyword lists
Recommendation
Include a landscape or fashion example to cover the use cases mentioned in the description that aren't otherwise demonstrated
18 / 20

Example 1 — Product Photography Input: "Luxury watch product shot for e-commerce hero image" Output:

Luxury stainless steel chronograph watch, brushed metal case with
polished bezel, black leather strap, positioned at 3/4 angle on a
dark slate surface | large overhead softbox creating soft gradient
highlight across the case, two strip lights camera left and right
for edge definition and dial legibility, deep charcoal seamless
background | shot on 100mm macro lens at f/8, focus stacked for
full sharpness on case and dial | clean, high-contrast commercial
post-processing, subtle reflection beneath watch, premium editorial
advertising quality, --ar 1:1 --v 6

Example 2 — Environmental Portrait Input: "Chef in his kitchen, authentic documentary feel" Output:

Middle-aged chef with salt-and-pepper beard, white double-breasted
jacket dusted with flour, mid-motion plating a dish, focused
expression, in a professional stainless steel kitchen with hanging
copper pots blurred in background | natural late-afternoon light
streaming through a high side window, warm and directional, soft
shadow falloff | shot on 35mm lens at f/2.2, eye level, shallow-to-
moderate depth of field keeping chef sharp and kitchen softly
legible | warm color palette, slight grain, candid unretouched
documentary style inspired by Peter Turnley

Example 3 — Negative Prompt Addition Input: Same watch prompt for Stable Diffusion Output: Add negative prompt field:

Negative prompt: blurry, low resolution, watermark, text, distorted
proportions, extra hands, plastic-looking material, overexposed
highlights, cluttered background
Recommendation
Consider adding a brief troubleshooting section for when outputs don't match expected lighting/composition despite following the structure
  • Convert every vague adjective into a technical photography term before finalizing a prompt
  • Keep lighting direction and shadow description physically consistent (don't describe rim light and flat shadows together)
  • Specify aspect ratio explicitly — it shapes composition choices the model makes
  • Reference specific photographers or film stocks (Kodak Portra, Cinestill 800T) for reliable aesthetic anchoring
  • For platforms supporting negative prompts, always exclude common artifacts (extra limbs, watermarks, distortion, plastic texture)
  • Build prompts as one flowing structure using | or commas to separate layers — don't jumble subject and lighting details together
  • When iterating, change one layer at a time (e.g., only lighting) to isolate what's driving output changes
  • Don't use ambiguous multi-purpose words ("dramatic," "nice," "beautiful") without technical backup — pair them with specifics
  • Don't mix incompatible technical specs (e.g., "wide angle lens" with "strong telephoto compression")
  • Don't omit camera/lens specification — models default to unpredictable framing without it
  • Don't overload a single prompt with more than one dominant photographer style reference — it produces muddled results
  • Don't forget aspect ratio and platform parameters — the same prompt without them yields inconsistent framing
  • Don't request physically implausible lighting/shadow combinations — models render these unpredictably
0
Grade A-AI Skill Framework
Scorecard
Criteria Breakdown
Quick Start
14/15
Workflow
14/15
Examples
18/20
Completeness
18/20
Format
14/15
Conciseness
14/15