AI Skill Report Card

Administering Personal Style Assessments

B+78·Sep 26, 2026·Source: Extension-page
YAML
--- name: administering-personal-style-assessments description: Guides selection, delivery, and application of CRG's Personal Style Indicator (PSI) and related style-based assessment tools for self-awareness, team building, leadership development, and hiring. Use when someone needs to interpret PSI results, design a workshop/training session using style assessments, recommend which CRG product bundle (report, workbook, PowerPoint, trainer's guide) fits a client's needs, or explain how personal style concepts apply to relationships, careers, or teams. --- # Administering Personal Style Assessments
13 / 15

When a client asks "which PSI product/package do I need?", match their role to the recommended bundle:

  • Individual wanting self-insight → PSI Report ($45) + optional "Why Aren't You More Like Me?" book
  • Trainer running a workshop → PSI Report + PowerPoint + Models Master Handouts + Trainer's Guidelines
  • Organization hiring → PSI/JSI Professional's Guide + Manager's JSI
  • Team/leadership development → PSI Report + Workbook ("Building Relationships with Style") + Leading/Selling/Coaching With Style (Level II or III)
  • Ongoing skill-building → PSI eCourse or PSI Trainer's eCourse
Recommendation▾
Add a bad-outcome example (e.g., misusing PSI as sole hiring criterion) to contrast with good practice examples
13 / 15

Progress:

  • Step 1: Identify the requester's context (individual, trainer, team lead, HR/hiring manager, educator)
  • Step 2: Determine their goal (self-awareness, team cohesion, conflict reduction, hiring, leadership, sales)
  • Step 3: Recommend the core assessment (PSI Report) plus supporting materials matched to delivery format
  • Step 4: Explain how to interpret style dimensions (response to time, tasks, people, situations) in plain language
  • Step 5: Suggest an action plan — how the person/team will apply insights (communication adjustments, role fit, stress management)
  • Step 6: Point to next-level resources (eCourses, certification, Level II/III materials) if deeper engagement is wanted
Recommendation▾
Include more concrete detail on the actual style dimension labels/names (CRG's specific style types) rather than generic descriptors

The PSI measures natural predisposition across four areas. When explaining results:

  1. Time — how the person paces work, deadlines, urgency
  2. Tasks — preference for structure/process vs. flexibility/outcomes
  3. People — preferred pace and depth of interpersonal engagement
  4. Situations — how they respond under stress, change, or ambiguity

Always frame findings as strengths with situational trade-offs, not fixed limitations — e.g., "This style tends toward quick decisiveness, which is a strength in fast-moving situations but can create friction when others need more deliberation time."

16 / 20

Example 1: Input: "I'm a manager wanting to reduce conflict on my team of 8." Output: Recommend each team member complete the PSI Report, then run a half-day workshop using the PSI PowerPoint + Models Master Handouts + Trainer's Guidelines. Debrief individual styles, map the team's style distribution, and use the Workbook's "Applying What You've Learned" section to build a team communication agreement.

Example 2: Input: "I'm hiring for a customer-facing sales role and want better fit." Output: Recommend the PSI/JSI Professional's Guide paired with the Manager's JSI (Job Style Indicator) to compare candidate style against ideal job-style profile before final hiring decision — not as a sole screening tool, but as one input alongside interviews.

Example 3: Input: "I just got my PSI report back — what do I do with it?" Output: Walk through the 20+ page report's strengths and "areas of difficulty" sections together, identify 1-2 stress-response patterns to watch for, and co-create a simple action plan: one relationship to improve, one work habit to adjust, one strength to lean into more intentionally.

Recommendation▾
Clarify pricing/availability specifics or note they're illustrative, since exact product costs may become outdated or inaccurate
  • Present style differences as descriptive, not diagnostic — there's no "best" style, only fit-for-context
  • Always pair the report with a debrief conversation or workshop; raw scores without interpretation lose value
  • Use a shared vocabulary (the CRG style model terms) so teams can discuss differences without judgment
  • For group settings, map the full team's styles visually to reveal blind spots and complementary strengths
  • Recommend the Workbook when the audience needs a lasting takeaway they can revisit post-session
  • Suggest certification/eCourses only to those repeatedly delivering PSI content, not one-time users
  • Don't treat a style label as a fixed personality "box" — it describes tendencies and preferences, not permanent traits
  • Don't use PSI results alone as the sole hiring/firing criterion — pair with interviews, references, and job-fit data
  • Don't skip the action-planning step — insight without application rarely changes behavior
  • Don't assume one style is superior; every style has situational strengths and stress-response weaknesses
  • Don't overload a session with all 200+ PowerPoint slides — customize to the group's time and goals
0
Grade B+AI Skill Framework
Scorecard
Criteria Breakdown
Quick Start
13/15
Workflow
13/15
Examples
16/20
Completeness
15/20
Format
15/15
Conciseness
13/15