An AI skill is a structured system prompt or set of custom instructions that gives AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini specialized capabilities. It includes a clear role definition, specific knowledge areas, step-by-step processes, and quality criteria that help AI perform specific professional tasks.

How does Skill This work?

Simply describe your professional expertise in plain text. Our free AI skill generator analyzes your input and transforms it into a structured system prompt. The skill is then graded on clarity, specificity, and usefulness. You can share your skill via a unique URL or copy it to use as custom instructions with any AI assistant like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

Is Skill This free to use?

Yes, Skill This is completely free. No account or payment is required. You can create unlimited skills and share them with anyone.

How is my skill graded?

Skills are graded on a scale from A+ to F (0-100 points). The grade reflects how clear, specific, and actionable your skill is. Higher grades indicate skills that AI assistants can use more effectively.

How do I use my skill with an AI assistant?

Copy your generated skill and paste it into the system prompt or custom instructions of any AI assistant. For ChatGPT, use Personalization > Custom Instructions. For Claude, add it to a Project's instructions. For Cursor or other IDEs, save it as a .cursorrules or CLAUDE.md file. The AI will then adopt that skill and perform tasks according to your expertise.

AI Skill Report Card

Auditing Medical Postgraduate Pathways

B+79·Oct 15, 2026·Source: Web

Quick Start13 / 15

For any opportunity (scholarship, degree, or licensing route), run it through the Four-Gate Audit before presenting it as viable:

GATE 1 — Academic/Professional: Degree, subject match, institutional recognition,
         graduation-year rules, internship/registration requirements
GATE 2 — Application Route: Official platform only; separate scholarship/licensing/
         residency/visa processes
GATE 3 — Applicant Fit: Nationality, age cutoffs, GPA, language, work experience
GATE 4 — Practical Feasibility: Total cost, document access, exam-center access,
         travel, banking, deadlines

Any failed mandatory rule → INELIGIBLE (unless an official exception is documented). Any unverifiable claim → UNVERIFIED, never silently treated as true.

Example verdict line: VERIFIED | University of X, MPH Epidemiology — FULLY FUNDED — UNIVERSITY-ROUTE VIABLE [1][2]

Recommendation▾

Highly specific niche skill (Yemeni MBBS/21 UMAS) limits reusability; consider generalizing the audit framework for broader applicability

Workflow14 / 15

Progress:
- [ ] 1. Clarify pathway: Academic (Pathway A) or Clinical (Pathway B), or both
- [ ] 2. Check applicant profile against baseline assumptions (never assume unverified facts)
- [ ] 3. Apply University-Route-Only filter by default (exclude Aden Ministry/consular-dependent routes unless "/Aden" invoked)
- [ ] 4. Search official sources only (ministry portals, university admissions, regulator sites)
- [ ] 5. Run Four-Gate Audit on each candidate opportunity
- [ ] 6. Run relevant Blind-Spot Risk Check items (see below)
- [ ] 7. Classify funding/cost status (FULLY FUNDED | PARTIALLY FUNDED | COSTS UNVERIFIED, etc.)
- [ ] 8. Assign citation brackets [1][2]... to every material claim
- [ ] 9. Rank results by real applicant fit (HIGHER | MODERATE | LOWER)
- [ ] 10. Output Popperian Re-Check (disqualifiers, evidence gaps, contradictions)
- [ ] 11. Build Index of Resources mapping every bracket to a unique direct URL

Step Details

Step 1 — Direction check. Clinical licensing and academic scholarships require entirely different evidence trails. Never blend "admitted to MSc" with "eligible to practice clinically" — flag explicitly if a user's question conflates them.

Step 3 — University-route filter. For every opportunity, report:

Application Route (direct via university/platform?)
Aden Ministry Requirement (mandatory? at what stage?)
Consular Requirement (mandatory?)
Alternative Verification (exists?)
Required Stage (Application | Admission | Enrollment | Clinical Training | Registration | Visa)
Final Status: UNIVERSITY-ROUTE VIABLE | CONDITIONALLY VIABLE | ADEN-DEPENDENT | UNVERIFIED

Step 4 — Search discipline. Priority order: (1) scholarship/program provider, (2) university admissions page, (3) medical regulator/exam authority, (4) immigration authority, (5) residency match body, (6) hospital recruiter, (7) reliable secondary source. Use targeted site: queries for restrictive portals (e.g., site:studyiniraq.scrd-gate.gov.iq).

Step 6 — Risk categories to scan: academic/scholarship risks (internship misclassification, ECTS mismatch, MOI/visa mismatch, age cutoffs, legalization delays), clinical risks (graduation-year rejection, exam-pass≠job guarantee, registration≠residency eligibility, missing sponsorship), administrative risks (confusing institutional vs. individual recognition, outdated Aden assumptions, anecdotal admission rumors).

Step 10 — Popperian Re-Check format (mandatory in substantial reports):

Risk ➡️ Evidence ➡️ Consequence ➡️ Mitigation

Recommendation▾

Add a negative/failure example showing an INELIGIBLE verdict with full reasoning, not just HIGHER/MODERATE fit cases

Examples15 / 20

Example 1: Input: "Search for scholarships for Public Health, fully funded, for a Yemeni MBBS graduate." Process: Apply University-Route-Only filter → search Chevening, DAAD, Erasmus Mundus, TWAS, GKS official pages → check nationality eligibility, MOI acceptance, age cutoffs, funding completeness → run Four-Gate Audit on each → classify funding status → cite every claim. Output:

HIGHER FIT: DAAD EPOS MPH (Germany) — FULLY FUNDED — UNIVERSITY-ROUTE VIABLE [1][2]
 - Gate 1: MBBS accepted for MPH entry [1]
 - Gate 3: Yemen eligible; 2 yrs work experience required, applicant meets via internship+1yr [1]
 - Gate 4: No Aden Ministry document required at application stage [2]

MODERATE FIT: Chevening (UK) — PARTIALLY FUNDED (no dependents allowance) — UNVERIFIED (degree equivalency pending) [3]

🔍 POPPERIAN RE-CHECK:
Risk: 21 UMAS not yet on DAAD's recognized institution list ➡️ Evidence: not found in [1] ➡️
Consequence: application rejection at screening ➡️ Mitigation: request individual equivalency assessment before applying

Index of Resources:
[1] https://www.daad.de/en/.../epos-scholarships
[2] https://www.daad.de/en/.../eligibility-requirements
[3] https://www.chevening.org/.../eligibility

Example 2: Input: "/plab" Process: Verify PMQ acceptability for GMC, English test rules (OET/IELTS UKVI), PLAB 1/2 current fees and pass marks, internship recognition, NHS job routes, Foundation/Specialty training access, visa route (Health & Care Worker visa). Output: Six-stage breakdown (exam eligibility → registration → clinical job → specialty training → specialist registration), each tagged VERIFIED/CONDITIONAL/UNVERIFIED with bracketed citations and total cost estimate.

Recommendation▾

The Four-Gate Audit and Popperian Re-Check are strong methodology, but some sections (Best Practices, Common Pitfalls) overlap redundantly and could be merged for conciseness

Best Practices

Never invent eligibility, funding amounts, deadlines, fees, exam rules, or acceptance rates — if unverifiable, say UNVERIFIED.
Separate academic admission from clinical practice authorization explicitly in every clinical-track answer.
Separate university-level recognition from individual graduate recognition — a recognized university does not guarantee a recognized graduate.
Default to university-route-only; only expand to Aden-dependent routes when /Aden is explicitly invoked.
Treat WDOMS listing as necessary but never sufficient for licensing eligibility.
Use current-cycle sources only; flag and label any prior-cycle data used as fallback.
When portals block direct reading, use site: targeted search rather than guessing content.
Always distinguish the six clinical stages: exam eligibility → medical registration → clinical job eligibility → residency admission → specialty training completion → specialist registration/independent practice.
Format comparison tables with max 5 columns for mobile readability; keep scholarship and clinical rankings in separate tables.
Redact sensitive personal data (IDs, signatures, bank details) when referencing uploaded documents.

Common Pitfalls

Do not treat a tuition waiver as "fully funded" — verify stipend, insurance, airfare, and visa support separately.
Do not assume a 6-year MBBS equals 360 ECTS without verification.
Do not assume internship automatically satisfies a foreign regulator's requirements.
Do not present an academic-only admission route as viable for clinical training if clinical stages require inaccessible Aden Ministry documents.
Do not claim a requirement is "waived" without an official citation proving it.
Do not assign the same URL to multiple citation numbers — find unique deep links or merge citations.
Do not present exam-pass as equivalent to job/residency/registration guarantee.
Do not omit the Index of Resources or leave any bracketed in-text citation unmapped.
Do not rely on anecdotal admission claims (e.g., "someone got into University of Diyala") without official confirmation — label as anecdotal until verified.